Home

Physical Geography
  Tectonics and Geology
  Climatic Change
  Climate at Present and in the Past
  Soils
  Rivers, Lakes, Seas and Wetlands
  Permafrost
  Biodiversity

Biomes & Regions
  Arctic Environments
  Boreal Forests
  Mixed and Deciduous Forests
  Steppe and Forest-steppe
  Arid Environments
  The Mountains of Northern Russia
  The Mountains of Southern Siberia
  The Caucasus
  The Mountains of Central Asia
  Lake Baikal
  The Far East

Environmental Problems
  Radioactive Contamination
  Oil and Gas Development
  Air Pollution
  The Aral Sea Problems
  Deforestation and Degradation of Forests
  Nature Protection and Conservation

Images of Russian Nature
  Geographic Index
  Systematic Index
  Alphabetical Index

Nature Reserves
  Northern Russia
  Central Russia
  Povolzhye (Volga river basin)
  Southern Russia
  Ural Mountains
  Western Siberia
  Eastern Siberia
  Far East


Фотографии природы России
  Географический каталог
  Систематический каталог
  Алфавитный каталог


Nature Landscapes of the World
  Europe
  Asia
  North America
  South America
  Africa
  Australia
  Antarctic

Field Ecology Education
  Instructive Videos
  Instructive Manuals


Экологический Центр Экосистема на Facebook Экологический Центр Экосистема ВКонтакте

Видеоканал Экосистема

Загрузить приложения из магазина Google Play / Play Market
Загрузить приложения из AppStore / iTunes

Share this page with your friends:



( ) : : = = + +


Russian Nature

Home | Physical Geography | Biomes & Regions | Environmental Problems | Images of Russian Nature | Nature Reserves


Please put an active hyperlink to our site (www.rusnature.info) when you copy the materials from this page

Environmental problems of Northern Eurasia

Air Pollution

<<< Air Pollution Data | Environmental Problems Index | Controlling Air Quality: Cleaner Fuels >>>

Air Pollution before 1990: Industry and Power Generation

Air pollution was serious in the USSR - but how bad was it compared to the industrialized Western nations? Assessments provide conflicting information: while many social scientists (e.g., Pryde, 1991; Feshbach and Friendly, 1992; Peterson, 1993) argue that air pollution was far worse in the USSR than in the West as a result of deficiencies of the Soviet political system and management practices, reports by the UNEP and WHO describe air pollution in major Soviet cities as moderate (WHO/UNEP, 1992; Mage et al, 1996).

With regard to air quality, there are a number of important differences between the FSU and the West. First, in contrast to the Western (especially Western European) countries, the Soviet economy was characterized by expanded production in the heavy industrial sector which (together with the cold climate) brought about high energy demands. Second, the lack of individual wealth restricted private car ownership and traffic congestion, a chronic Western problem, was not a pressing issue in most Soviet cities. These factors created a pattern which was different from that observed in the West: while many small and medium industrial towns in the FSU were extremely polluted, levels of air pollution in large cities were often lower than in the large Western conurbations. Only two (namely Moscow and Baku) out of the ten cities with the highest emission discharges in 1988 had a population over a million; the rest had a population of 140-600 thousand. Another distinguishing and indeed disturbing feature was the frequent occurrence of highly toxic contaminants such as various metals, benzo(a)pyrene (a carcinogenic hydrocarbon), formaldehyde, and phenol. The particularly high concentrations of toxic pollutants were typical of small industrial towns with climatic conditions favouring pollution build-up, especially in the towns of Central and Eastern Siberia. Urban planning also had an important effect on exposure to pollution. Built or industrialized in the 1930s-1950s, many FSU towns and cities accommodate heavy industry and are not designed for the use of private cars. These are compact cities with the population living in close proximity to industrial facilities being exposed to high levels of air pollution.

Heavy industry and power generation were the main contributors to air pollution in the FSU especially to that by SPM and SO2 (Figure 21.4).

Atmospheric emissions in the former Soviet Union

Fig. 21.4 Atmospheric emissions in the former Soviet Union

In the 1980s, the levels of SO2 emissions from European Russia were higher than in any West European country while emissions from the USSR were approaching those from the US (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994; Hill, 1997, 2000). Power generation provided over 40 per cent of the total SO2 emissions and over 30 per cent of the total SPM emissions. The amount of pollution emitted by power plants is influenced by the capacity of a power station and the type of fuel burnt. Sulphur is the most common impurity contained in coal and oil while its amount in natural gas is negligible, and therefore high emissions and ambient concentrations of SO2 and SPM were associated with the large coal-burning stations. Coal was the main type of fuel in the coal-mining regions of Donbass (Ukraine), Kuzbass (Western Siberia), Kansk-Achinsk region (Eastern Siberia), and Ekibastuz-Karaganda region in Kazakhstan. The highest SO2 emission densities of nearly 10 tonnes per km2 (according to the official Soviet reports) occurred in the Donbass which accommodated not only a coal-mining industry but also the largest steel and iron mills in the country (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994). Despite the high energy demands, the contribution of power plants to total SO2 emissions was relatively low: for example, in the UK over 70 per cent of industrial SO2 emissions come from power generation. This relatively low proportion is explained by the large input of non-ferrous metallurgy, an energy-demanding branch of industry processing ores with a high sulphur content. In the 1980s, the USSR was the largest producer of such non-ferrous metals as nickel, copper, and zinc and in 1988 (the peak production year) non-ferrous smelters contributed 25 per cent of SO2 emissions. Copper and nickel smelting facilities in Norilsk (the Taymyr peninsula), and Monchegorsk, Nikel, and Zapolyarny (the Kola peninsula), as well as lead smelting facilities in Balkhash (Kazakhstan) were among the largest individual contributors, emitting between 200 000 tonnes and 2.4 million tonnes of SO2 per year (Figure 21.5). In Norilsk, a town with a population of 180 000, SO2 emissions exceeded 12 000 tonnes per capita (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994). The Urals, and in particular the steel and iron-producing city of Magnitogorsk, was another region with extremely high SO2 emissions. Across the FSU, ferrous metallurgy was the main branch of industry contributing about 40 per cent of total SPM emissions.

Sulphur dioxide emissions between 1980 and 1995

Fig. 21.5 Sulphur dioxide emissions between 1980 and 1995

Ambient concentrations of SO2 and SPM in the FSU cities are difficult to evaluate because the methods of SO2 sampling and SPM analysis are notoriously insensitive (UNEP/WHO, 1992). Thus, SPM concentrations are still measured gravimetrically and the accuracy of these measurements is very poor. Therefore, only approximate statistics can be given for urban areas where SO2 and SPM levels are high. The highest concentrations of SO2 are observed in Norilsk where annual mean concentrations in the 1980s-1990s ranged between 110 and 140 iug m-3 while daily means as high as 1300-1500 mg m-3 were reported. In many other metal-producing towns (e.g., towns of the Kola peninsula and the Donbass region) annual concentrations exceeded 70-80 mg m-3 (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994) which is well above the WHO guidelines (Table 21.1).

Air pollution standards and guidelines

Table 21.1 Air pollution standards and guidelines

Similarly, high SPM levels were observed in towns accommodating coal-burning power plants, iron and steel mills, and facilities producing construction materials. Those located in arid environments, where high natural dust concentrations are found, experienced especially high concentrations. Thus, in many towns of Armenia and Central Asia annual mean concentrations exceeded 600 mg m-3 while the WMO recommends that 90 mg m-3 threshold should not be exceeded. In general, high SPM levels (about 200-300 (ug m-3) were typical of the FSU cities, especially in the warm season of the year. However, health effects of the high SPM concentrations are difficult to evaluate because total SPM is measured and no differentiation between SPM fractions is made. Airborne particulate matter is a complex mixture of organic and inorganic substances with particle size ranging between coarse material (e.g., soil or sand particles) and fine aerosols. These are specified by size: e.g., PM10 or PM2 s refer to particles less than 10 or 2.5 Am in diameter. Fine aerosols, formed through the oxidation of gases in the atmosphere or released during combustion or from industrial processes, usually contain acid and organic compounds. They can penetrate deeply into the lungs and are damaging to health. While it is almost certain that coarse material, contributed among other sources by fugitive dust blown into the air from construction sites or poorly surfaced roads, constitutes the bulk of SPM pollution, it is fine particulate matter that has the most detrimental effects on health. Although data on levels of pollution by fine particulate matter are not available, high levels of benzo(a)pyrene and lead, derived from the analysis of SPM samples, occur widely in the FSU cities, allowing one to speculate about the role that SPM pollution plays in causing increased morbidity (Bezuglaya et al., 1993). Of particular concern was pollution by asbestos, another potent carcinogen, the production and use of which have been banned in many countries of Western Europe and in the United States. In the Urals, the small industrial town, Asbest, whose name (meaning asbestos in Russian) speaks for itself, was among the top five urban areas in the FSU with the highest emissions of SPM (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994).

Oxides of nitrogen, of which nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are reported as the most important, are contributed both from stationary sources and vehicles (Figure 21.4). In contrast to SO2, total NOX emissions in the FSU were about 2.5 lower than those in the United States, the difference being explained by the far lower levels of vehicular emissions in the FSU where only about a third of the total NOX was contributed by transport (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994; Hill, 1997, 2000). In the late 1980s, power generation provided the main input, contributing 60 per cent of NOX pollution, while vehicular NOX emissions exceeded those from stationary sources in less than 30 per cent of all urban areas. Cities with high emissions from traffic included four out of fifteen capitals of the former republics (Alma-Ata, Ashgabat, Baku, and Tbilisi) and important administrative centres (e.g., Lvov, Rostov-upon-Don, and Voronezh) and particularly those located in the southern part of the country which reflected both lower demand for heating and higher than average private car ownership. In 1988, the number of private cars in the Northern Caucasus, Transcaucasia, and Central Asia ranged between 23 and 34 per 100 families increasing from 2 to 3 in the 1970s while the national average increase in private car ownership was from 2 to 17 (Sagers, 1991).

The highest ambient concentrations of NO2, an oxide of nitrogen that dominates the urban atmosphere, occurred mainly in large administrative and industrial cities of south-eastern European Russia, eastern and southern Ukraine, the Caucasus, the southern Urals, and Central Asia as a result of emission patterns and climatic influence. While nitric oxide (NO) is a primary pollutant, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is largely a secondary one that is produced through the oxidation of NO by ozone within minutes of NO emission. The rates of photochemical oxidation depend on air temperature and sunlight and for this reason NO2 pollution is often seen as a problem affecting urban areas with hot summers. There are many such cities in the FSU and frequently annual mean concentrations of NO2 reached 110-150 mg m-3. Winter episodes of NO2 pollution can be of a similar severity partly because of the alternative ways of NO2 production and partly because of unfavourable meteorological conditions (see above).

While individual sources generated high pollution levels locally, the average national and regional levels of SO2 and NOX concentrations and the deposition of sulphur and nitrogen were lower than in Western Europe as a result of the large land mass. With the exception of a few regions around large sources (e.g., the Kola peninsula), the highest background concentrations of SO2 are observed along the western border of the FSU (indicating the transportation of pollutants from Western and Central Europe) and in the Donbass and the central regions of European Russia where it is caused by the higher concentration of industry. According to Cooperative Programme for Monitoring and Evaluation of the Long Range Transmission of Air Pollution in Europe (EMEP), in the early 1990s the total deposition of oxidized sulphur ranged between 0.2 and 0.5 g(S) m-2 across most of the European FSU while in Western and Central Europe sulphur deposition varied between 0.5 and 2 g(S) m-2 (Tuovinen et al., 1994). Evaluation of critical loads (quantitative estimates of an exposure to pollutants below which significant harmful effects on specified sensitive elements of the environment do not occur) has shown that most of the European FSU (and especially its eastern part) are in no danger of pollution by sulphur. Acid deposition in the Asiatic territory is lower than in the European part.

Carbon monoxide (CO) is almost exclusively a vehicular pollutant in the West where over 90 per cent of it is produced by cars (Elsom, 1996). In the FSU, where private car ownership was low, cars contributed just over 60 per cent of CO total emissions in 1988 while ferrous metallurgy was another major contributor, providing near a half of all CO emissions from stationary sources (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994). The highest emissions of CO occurred either in big cities which combined relatively large number of vehicles with heavy industry, especially machinery works and petroleum refineries (e.g., Moscow, St. Petersburg, Tashkent, Tbilisi, Baku, Kiev, Yerevan, and Omsk), or in towns with large steel mills (Figure 21.6).

Carbon monoxide emissions between 1980 and 1995

Fig. 21.6 Carbon monoxide emissions between 1980 and 1995

In regional terms, the Donetsk-Dnieper region and the Urals experienced the highest emissions from stationary sources (3.2 and 2.4 million tonnes, respectively in 1988). Among individual cities, the Ukrainian city of Krivoy Rog (the major FSU centre for metallurgy; population 683 000) was ahead of Moscow (population 9.4 million) with 900 000 tonnes against 660 000 tonnes. The production of steel and iron and, consequently, emissions of CO peaked in 1981; in the late 1980s, a 20 per cent decrease in industrial output of CO occurred following a decline in metal production. By contrast, a 70 per cent growth in CO emissions was registered in the gas- and oil-producing regions of Western Siberia where many new oil and gas wells began operating without adequate pollution control equipment. Despite the slowly growing car ownership, vehicular emissions of CO declined by almost 40 per cent throughout the 1980s as the enormous Soviet fleet of heavy-duty trucks, whose emissions were very poorly controlled, was updated and many vehicles were converted to run on natural gas, a cheaper as well as cleaner fuel producing 90 per cent less CO than petrol.

Ambient concentrations of CO strongly depend on climate. First, emissions are greatest when an engine is first started from cold and this effect is exacerbated by low air temperatures. Second, being emitted mostly from the low-elevated sources, CO levels build up when ventilation is restricted as a result of atmospheric stability or topography. This is why it is industrial towns of Siberia which experienced frequent temperature inversions, and Transcaucasia and Central Asia, which are often located in valleys, experienced the highest annual mean concentrations of CO of 3.5 5 mg m-3 (Shahgedanova and Burt, 1994). Annual concentrations of 6 mg m-3 were registered in Yerevan, the capital of Armenia, located in a deep basin subject to protracted periods of air stagnation. By contrast, Moscow which had only 650 000 cars in 1988, experienced moderate levels of CO pollution of 2-2.5 mg m-3 (Shahgedanova et al., 1999).

Of great concern is pollution by volatile organic compounds (VOCs), a wide range of organic compounds including hydrocarbons and oxygenates. Many VOCs (emitted or formed in the atmosphere) are known to be cancer-inducing; they also have high photochemical reactivity and contribute considerably to the formation of photochemical smog. Concentrations of three pollutants have been consistently high in the FSU cities: benzo(a)pyrene, formaldehyde, and phenol. Particularly dangerous is pollution by benzo(oc)pyrene, a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon which forms during the combustion of fossil fuels (especially coal) at low temperatures where there is little oxygen. It is classified as a genotoxic carcinogen, a substance that is capable of causing cancer and affecting the DNA, and there is no safe level of exposure to this pollutant. Both ambient concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene and its contents in SPM were measured regularly in 160 cities (Bezuglaya et al., 1993). While the annual mean concentrations averaged across all the cities varied between 2.5x10-3 - 3.5x10-3 mg m-3, depending on the weather, in urban areas accommodating large power plants, steel, and aluminium mills annual levels ranged between 4x10-3 and 6x10-3 mg m-3, reaching 15x10-3 mg m-3. Two other important sources of benzo(a)pyrene were domestic combustion of coal, and railway transport which uses coal for heating carriages. Both are typical of Siberian towns especially those located along the Trans-Siberian railway. Ambient concentrations of benzo(a)pyrene depend on weather and climate: the largest concentrations occur in winter, where heating needs are high; in summer, when benzo(a)pyrene is destroyed by photochemical reactions, its levels are several times lower. A cold winter climate, together with predominantly anticyclonic weather and complex topography restricting dispersion, enhance pollution by benzo(a)pyrene in the towns of Southern Siberia. In such cities as Bratsk, Chita, Krasnoyarsk, and many others monthly mean concentrations in winter exceed 70x10-3 mg m-3.

<<< Air Pollution Data | Environmental Problems Index | Controlling Air Quality: Cleaner Fuels >>>

 

 


Recommend this page to your friends:


* * | |