Physical Geography
  Tectonics and Geology
  Climatic Change
  Climate at Present and in the Past
  Rivers, Lakes, Seas and Wetlands

Biomes & Regions
  Arctic Environments
  Boreal Forests
  Mixed and Deciduous Forests
  Steppe and Forest-steppe
  Arid Environments
  The Mountains of Northern Russia
  The Mountains of Southern Siberia
  The Caucasus
  The Mountains of Central Asia
  Lake Baikal
  The Far East

Environmental Problems
  Radioactive Contamination
  Oil and Gas Development
  Air Pollution
  The Aral Sea Problems
  Deforestation and Degradation of Forests
  Nature Protection and Conservation

Images of Russian Nature
  Geographic Index
  Systematic Index
  Alphabetical Index

Nature Reserves
  Northern Russia
  Central Russia
  Povolzhye (Volga river basin)
  Southern Russia
  Ural Mountains
  Western Siberia
  Eastern Siberia
  Far East

‘отографии природы –оссии
  √еографический каталог
  —истематический каталог
  јлфавитный каталог

Nature Landscapes of the World
  North America
  South America

Field Ecology Education
  Instructive Videos
  Instructive Manuals

Ёкологический ÷ентр Ёкосистема на Facebook Ёкологический ÷ентр Ёкосистема ¬ онтакте

ётуб канал Ёкосистема YouTube EcosystemaRu

—качать приложени€ Ёкосистемы Ёко√ид из магазина Google Play / Play Market
—качать приложени€ Ёкосистемы Ёко√ид из AppStore / iTunes
¬идео-360 по экологии на нашем Youtube канале

Bird Decoys for European Birds: Songs, Calls, Sounds, Bird voices - application for Android download from Google Play / Play Market for free

Share this page with your friends:

( ) : : = = + +

Russian Nature

Home | Physical Geography | Biomes & Regions | Environmental Problems | Images of Russian Nature | Nature Reserves

Our Field Ecology Center published more than 180 methodical materials for nature studies. Some of them are in English:
Mobile educational application: Ecological Field Studies Techniques on Play.Google Mobile field guide Birds of North America: Songs and Calls Decoys on Play.Google WILD FLOWERS OF RUSSIA Field Identification Guide on Play.Google Mobile field guide Birds of Russia on Play.Google Mobile field guide Birds of Russia Songs, Calls and Voices on Play.Google Mobile field guide Birds of Europe Songs, Calls and Voices on Play.Google Mobile field guide Birds of Europe Songs, Calls and Voices on Play.Google
Mobile Educational Apps and Field Identification Guides for Russian, European and American Birds
Applications for Android and iOS are available at GooglePlay and AppStore

Please put an active hyperlink to our site (www.rusnature.info) when you copy the materials from this page

Environmental problems of Northern Eurasia

Radioactive Contamination

<<< Contaminated Regions Resulting from the Chernobyl Accident | Environmental Problems Index | Tomsk and Krasnoyarsk >>>

The Mayak Facility in the Southern Urals

The second highly polluted area in the FSU is the region affected by the 'Kyshtym disaster'. The general location of this contaminated zone is about 100 km northwest of the city of Chelyabinsk, where more high-level radiation has been released into the environment than from Chernobyl. The Kyshtym disaster was actually three separate incidents of high-level radiation releases, occurring over the period 1949-64 (Monroe, 1992). The location of the accidents was near the 'secret cities' of Chelyabinsk-40 and Chelyabinsk-65 (now called Ozersk), which were about 20 km east of Kyshtym (Figure 19.3). This was a huge complex, with a restricted area that reportedly covered up to 2700 km2 in the 1950s. The five graphite reactors located there produced over 58 tonnes of plutonium-239 through 1990 (Donnay et al., 1995). The accidents occurred at the Mayak Production Association's plutonium reprocessing complex. Since 1991, this facility has been frequently visited by Western nuclear specialists, and now operates as the 'first national fuel reprocessing plant' (Bradley, 1997).

It is now known that at least 130 million curies of radioactivity have been discharged into the environment from operations at the Mayak plant. This staggering figure is about 2.6 times the amount of radiation released from the Chernobyl explosion and fire in 1986. In human terms, about 500 000 people have been exposed to elevated radiation doses, and about 18 000 have had to be relocated. Over 2000 workers have suffered 'occupational radiation sickness', 935 residents have been diagnosed with chronic radiation sickness, and 3 7 cases of leukaemia have been reported (Pryde and Bradley, 1994).

The initial problem resulted from the deposition of millions of cubic metres of nuclear wastes directly into the Techa river, whose source is near the Mayak plant. These high level discharges into the river occurred mainly from 1949 to 1952; but contamination continued at a reduced rate until at least 1964. The Iset, Tobol, and Ob, which receive the waters of the Techa, were also affected. As many as 124 000 people who reside near the Techa were exposed to radiation, an estimated fifth of them to fairly high doses (Bradley, 1997). Residents of this area statistically suffer elevated rates of infant mortality and malignant tumours (Bradley, 1997). A separate study indicated significant increases in leukaemia in this region, believed to be caused by the wastes discharged into the Techa (Kossenko, 1990, 1992). The village of Muslyumovo, which was not evacuated, is 'still quite contaminated from past activities at Mayak', with radiation readings along the Techa there up to 40 times the norm (Bradley, 1997).

The second crisis (the one originally referred to as the 'Kyshtym disaster') occurred in September 1957, but was generally unknown until the publication of Zhores Medvedev's 1979 book Nuclear Disaster in the Urals. Prior to 1986, it was the worst nuclear accident ever to occur. It involved a chemical explosion in a high level waste storage tank, which released about 2 million total curies of radiation, and over 100 000 curies of strontium-90, which were carried by the wind for hundreds of kilometres to the north-east, an area now known as the East Urals Radioactive Trace. Over 500 km2 of downwind territory received strontium-90 fallout in excess of 2 curies per km2 (Bradley, 1997; Donnay et al., 1995). The fallout just barely missed the industrial city of Kamensk-Uralsky (Figure 19.3). The accident necessitated evacuation of 7500 residents from twenty nearby villages, and large areas of forest were destroyed by radiation (Romanov et al, 1991; Bradley, 1997).

Radioactive fallout zone resulting from the 1957 - 64 'Kyshtym disaster'

Fig. 19.3 Radioactive fallout zone resulting from the 1957-64 'Kyshtym disaster'

The third large release of radiation at the Mayak facility involved high level wastes in a storage pond known as Lake Karachai. The filling of Lake Karachai began in 1951, when the discharge of wastes into the Techa river was terminated. The main release of radiation at this lake occurred in 1967 when, following a drought, winds picked up radioactive dust particles from the exposed shoreline of the lake, and deposited them up to 75 km downwind. The lake's bottom has since been stabilized to minimize further releases of radiation, but Lake Karachai remains the primary contamination problem at Mayak, and was studied in detail during the 1990s (Bradley, 1997).

The contamination of workers at the Mayak plant has been extensive. From 1948 to 1960, a total of 2089 workers were diagnosed with 'occupational radiation sickness'. About 1500 Chelyabinsk-65 workers had 'chronic radiation sickness'; overall, 188 people had actual radiation burns, 41 suffered from 'acute radiation syndrome', and at least 4 persons died. Lifetime radiation exposure among workers at Chelyabinsk-65 was 30-80 times more than for workers at Hanford (Washington) and Oak Ridge (Tennessee) (Donnay et al, 1995; Bradley, 1997).

<<< Contaminated Regions Resulting from the Chernobyl Accident | Environmental Problems Index | Tomsk and Krasnoyarsk >>>



Recommend this page to your friends:

* *